The document was primarily based on research evidence rather than experiential expertise. While the systematic review included a lived experience researcher and carer in the research team, it found that only three of the seven studies incorporated lived experience perspectives, and only one study included a researcher with lived experience. The authors explicitly noted that the lived experience voice remains "overshadowed by that of clinicians" in this research area.
Communication pathways from the emergency department to community mental health services: A systematic review
Overview
This systematic review examines communication pathways between emergency departments and community mental health services. Seven studies identified support coordination, motivational interviewing, and electronic record enhancements as effective strategies for improving continuity of care and reducing ED re-presentations for people with mental health concerns.
Downloads
Key insights
Key Insights:
-
Support coordination significantly reduces psychiatric ED repeat presentations by patients
-
Motivational interviewing improves mental health treatment attendance after ED discharge
-
Electronic record alerts increase primary care physician communication by 40%
-
Only three studies included lived experience perspectives in research design
-
Adolescent studies showed higher follow-up rates than adult interventions
-
Phone follow-up alone had minimal impact on appointment attendance
-
Multipronged approaches combining strategies may be most effective for continuity
-
Limited research exists on ED-to-community mental health communication pathways
Did this resource draw on transformative evidence?
This document was minimally based on practical wisdom. As a systematic review of research studies, it primarily synthesized academic evidence rather than practical, on-the-ground experience. While it included some service user quotes and experiences from ED settings, the focus was on evaluating controlled interventions rather than capturing the accumulated practical knowledge of frontline clinicians, patients, or community mental health workers who navigate these communication pathways daily.
This document was extensively based on research and evaluation insights. As a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, it analyzed seven studies across multiple databases, evaluating interventions like support coordination, motivational interviewing, and electronic record systems. The authors conducted critical appraisal, data extraction, and synthesized findings from randomized controlled trials and qualitative studies to assess effectiveness of communication pathways between emergency departments and community mental health services.